One thing that the Democrat Party learned from Barrack Obama
are the strategies of the Marxist pair, Cloward-Piven, on how to galvanize
community action groups to gain power, and the application of Saul Alinksy’s ‘Rules
for Radicals’ against political opponents for the same purpose. In this
case the target has been Donald Trump.
The ultimate aim is to gain power, keep it, and change the
country, not by giving the people what they want, but by making them dependent
on an overpowering government.
Alinsky’s writings are the lodestar for radicals in
building militant community organizations in order to gain power. Although not
a Communist, his rules are a step ladder to hardened Socialism.
Was it accidental or deliberate that Alinksy invoked Lucifer and the resultant hell as an inspiration?
"The very first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did so effectively that he at least won his open kingdom - Lucifer."
That "kingdom" was hell. Isn't it always when rampant Socialists, Marxists and anarchists get their way?
Hillary
Clinton, as a student, was an ardent fan of Alinsky. They exchanged letters.
Perhaps more important to Democrat radicals is the influence
of the Marxist activists, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. The four aims
of the Coward-Piven strategy are;
Overload and Break the Welfare
System.
Have Chaos Ensue.
Take Control in the Chaos.
Implement Socialism and Communism
through Government Force.
Their end game was to totally
transmute America into a centralized welfare state. This is being done as I
write this by wily operators trained in the Marxism of the doctrine to exploit conditions
of overwhelming distress and division through social upheaval and violence, and
use that violence to wield influence over local and state leadership, and by
leading the people via mass street protests to overturn the system and topple government.
Part of their plan is the
suspension of civil liberties, an issue that should scare liberal Democrats,
but apparently doesn’t.
Cloward-Piven pinned their
ambitions back in the 60s in promoting disruptions within the Democrat Party.
They ruled that mass unrest brings
more people onto welfare which was a vital component of their political
ideology. To make more people dependent on government.
A political mechanism designed to
end poverty via social unrest in the end makes everyone poor.
In America, the Democrats distract attention away from what
they themselves are plotting by deflecting their own game onto Donald Trump. It’s
a psychological trick. Don’t look at me, look at him.
Example 1. Russian Collusion. They pinned this on Trump after
Obama had spent eight years doing just that, colluding with the Russians.
Proof 1. Uranium One in which Obama, with the active help of
Hillary Clinton, sold 80% of America’s uranium stockpile to Putin, via dubious
Russian companies and Kremlin proxies who donated large sums of money into the
Clinton Foundation and gave Bill Clinton $500,000 speaking engagements in
Moscow. Russian collusion.
Proof 2. Obama’s embarrassing open mike conversation with
Russian President, Dmitri Medvedev, saying in 2012, “This is my last election. After my election I have more
flexibility," to which Medvedev replied that he would "transmit this information to Vladimir." Russian
collusion.
Proof 3. Obama used
Biden to schmooze up to Ukraine, one of the most corrupt European countries at
that time. When Russia invaded Ukraine, Obama offered them army blankets and
tents, but no military aid that would have helped them defend their country.
Obama’s policy enabled Russia to occupy large tracts of Ukrainian territory. Russian
collusion.
Proof 4. Obama drew a
red line demanding Assad not to use chemical weapons against his own people.
Despite that red line, Assad brazenly barrel-bombed his people, and Obama did
nothing, enabling the Russians to walk into Syria and side with Assad openly.
Proof 5. Russian
collusion was evident throughout Obama’s term as president, but this was the lie
they leveled against Trump, even before he became president. And they did it by
manufacturing a fake dossier based on Russian disinformation obtained with
payments from the Democrat National Committee and the Hillary Clinton Campaign to
a foreign agent, Christopher Steele, to come up with Russian dirt on Trump
which he did with the disinformation given to him by his Kremlin contacts. Russian
collusion.
Despite a three-year
investigation, no evidence was found that linked Trump with the Russians. But
real Russian collusion was evident with Obama personally, his policies and the
actions of his officials. Plot and Deflect.
Example 2. Create a
crisis and blame the president for the crisis.
Proof 1. Almost without
exception, Democrat governors and mayors mishandled the Wuhan Virus pandemic, if
“mishandling” is the right word. Mishandling is when you do something
mistakenly or negligently. But the
prolonged lockdown, ruined the economy of too many states and cities. The
authoritarian rule of many Democratic governors is plain to see. Many of their
citizens will never recover from the economic damage imposed on them.
Proof 2. Moving infected
patients into old age homes would, even to a simple person, seems like a death
warrant, but this is what too many Democrat governors did under the advice of
their Democrat health officials, as they blamed the President for the massive
crisis they had created. In short, ruin the economy and then blame Trump for
ruining the economy. Plot and Deflect.
Proof 3. Governors and
mayors imposed stringent lockdowns, often with the threat of imprisonment and
heavy fines on regular, hardworking, law-abiding citizens. But these same “health
aware” governors and mayors encouraged the masses to take to the streets in
an orgy of protests and mayhem in the name of healthy civil rights. In short,
create anarchy and then blame the President for the anarchy and uptick of virus
cases they have promoted. Plot and Deflect.
Proof 4. Local Democrat
leaders and officials did the one thing a democratic nation should never do
when there is massive civil unrest – defund and dismantle law enforcement. This
is a recipe for increased violence and anarchy. But this is precisely what the
Democrats did.
Proof 5. They did it to
draw a reaction from the President, a typical tactic of Alinsky’s Rules for
Radicals. And when the President did what any President is obliged to do by
sending in a Federal force to protect Federal property, people including Nancy
Pelosi accused Trump of sending in “storm troopers,” acting like “Gestapo”
and “Nazis.” Light a spark, then
blame your opponent for the consequences. Plot and Distract.
Alinksy wrote in 1972,
“The
Revolutionary force today are reminiscent of the idealistic early Christians,
yet they also urge violence and cry, ‘Burn the system down!’”
The violence is
justified, and victims invisible, depersonalized, merely symbols.
“The
Radical may resort to the sword but when he does he is not filled with hatred
against those individuals whom he attacks. He hates these individuals not as
persons but as symbols representing ideas or interests which he believes to be
inimical to the welfare of the people.” (Alinsky 1946)
Alinksy
despised liberals.
“Liberals
utter bold words; they strut, grimace belligerently, and then issue a
weasel-worded statement ‘which has tremendous implications, if read between the
lines.’ They sit calmly, dispassionately, studying the issue; judging both
sides; they sit and still sit.” (Alinsky 1971)
This is
bad news for the liberal Alan Dershowitz’s who pray at the Democrat Party
temple and are unable to tear themselves away, even when they discover the
radical church is using a completely different prayer book.
And now they are
plotting the greatest deception of all. To steal an election.
They are taking no
chances, even to the point of introducing dubious methods they can exploit to
their advantage, including a campaign to allow the use of absentee ballots and
mail-in votes on a grand scale. They claim there is no criminality or fraud by
using such unconventional methods.
But they are wrong,
In a sampling of
election fraud cases across America, there have been 1,071 proven cases of
voter fraud leading to 938 convictions, 43 civil penalties, 74 discovered diversion
attempts, 8 judicial and 8 official findings, according to the Heritage Foundation.
They know they are lying,
but they will do it anyway. It’s part of their plot to seize power.
They are already
projecting their guilt onto Trump, if they are prevented or caught out engaging
in vote rigging, they will accuse him of wanting to steal the election, as they
plot and organize to do precisely that.
Here again, we smell the
Plot and Deflect tactic at work.
Headline from the
Washington Post. July 20. “Biden
predicts Trump will try to ‘indirectly steal’ the election.”
Proof 1. The Open
Democracy broadsheet of July 24 printed, “The outlook for a free and fair
election (meaning one in which the Democrats can manipulate the outcome
with massive manipulation of absentee ballots) in November is cloudy, not
least because the president himself has predicted mass-scale voter fraud (which
is what they are planning) and foreign interference.”
Proof 2. Democrat states
face federal lawsuits and litigation from complaints lodged by Judicial Watch claiming, on a grand scale, that certain states are not maintaining proper voter rolls as required by federal claw arguing that this leaves the door open to “dirty elections.” The states in question include Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Maryland, California,
Virginia and Colorado.
Proof 3. In a May 2020 Judicial Watch investigation it
was discovered that there were 800,000 illegible voters listed in just three
Pennsylvania counties. A left wing group submitted a motion to dismiss claiming
these were not illegible but merely “inactive,” but this is precisely
where the fraud potentially comes in by malevolent actors activating inactive
voters.
Proof 4. In preparation
for the riots that will surely follow a Trump victory, the same Open Democracy
piece deflected the potential violence perpetrated by sore radical losers by
deflecting their intentions onto the president;
“Given
the tense situation in the country (caused by their own people), it would take only a spark,
whether spontaneous or deliberate, to ignite a social conflagration in key
cities before the November 3 election.”
Plot and Deflect, par
excellence, given that the only “social conflagrations” we witness in
America has been initiated by the radical left of the Democrat Party.
What they really are
telling us is, despite their efforts to steal an election, if they lose, expect
more looting, pillaging, arson and destruction after a Trump victory.
If you think that
preparations for vote rigging is a far-fetched conspiracy theory, consider
this.
Why is it, do you think,
that Barrack Obama has been working for a hundred days in setting up a national
network of community organizers to operate local groups of election activists Obama
has set up a national campaign with 250 branches and a staff of 32,000 people
using a budget, according to the IRS, of tens of millions of dollars, operating
out of a HQ in Obama’s Washington, DC, office, headed by Valerie Jarrett, his
one-time Iran negotiator. Obama's Attorney-General, Eric Holder, is involved.
Why would a former
president, whose legacy has been ruined by the incumbent, spend his time and
money to go back to community organizing? As a hobby? Not likely.
Obama is working to
swing the election result just as he operated his inner
circle of intelligence agencies, FBI and Justice Department, to go after a
political opponent. All this will become clear when the hammer comes down on
the findings of the Barr-Durham probe into grave misconduct by leading
officials of the Obama Administration.
Obama is central in the
upcoming Plot and Distract operation to regain power, by using the Cloward-Piven/Saul
Alinsky methods he knows and has practiced in the past. And he is not expending
all this money and effort just as a favor to his VP.
Plot and Deflect. The
Democrats are working to the playbook of Alinksy and the Marxist pair.
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize
it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after
people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.”
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense.
It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to
force the enemy into concessions.’
The
target is President Trump as the personification of a Government they wish to
overturn.
Plot and Deflect. Watch
out! It’s coming to a polling station near you.
Barry
Shaw, Israel Institute for Strategic Studies.