The Security Council vote was not about settlements. It was
about something far worse.
The UNSC vote was not about “settlements.” It was an Arab subterfuge, a trap into which
the United States, the UK, New Zealand and other naive or cynical diplomats took
an active role.
It was all smoke and mirrors, a
con trick holding up the settlement issue to dazzle the voters while the real
intent was to disown Israel of territories to which they have genuine claim and
turn them into “illegally occupied Palestinian territory.”
For certain, President Obama
latched on to the idea. It was pay-back time, a golden opportunity not to be
missed to hit back at Bibi before handing in the keys to the White House. For
shame!
Now we know that Obama was cooking
up this evil brew back in November.
Not too many people noticed that
Obama’s Secretary of State sneaked into New Zealand in November for a quick
visit. The visit was to discuss the impending Security Council meeting. The
press was given to believe that the burning issue was Syria, but nobody is
putting it past Kerry that he didn’t get into a huddle with Kiwi leaders about
supporting this anti-Israel settlement resolution. New Zealand has a seat in
the Security Council.
When Egypt withdrew their sponsorship
of the anti-Israel proposal due to the intervention of President-Elect Trump it
probably took nothing more than a quick phone call to get New Zealand to step
up and join Malaysia, Senegal and Venezuela in sponsoring the treacherous
United Nations act.
That Obama’s finger was all over
it was confirmed by Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Obama was pulling the strings but
it was the Palestinian/Arab narrative that was written into the resolution.
Israel’s voice, its legitimate rights and claims to all or parts of the territory,
were ignored.
So, how did it go beyond the
issue of settlements?
The wording of a flagrantly
biased resolution wrongly claimed that “settlements in the Palestinian
territory occupied since 1967, including east Jerusalem has no legal validity
and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law.”
This is blatantly incorrect.
It corrupted UN Resolution 242 of
1967 that called on Israel armed forces to withdraw from territory according to
a timetable. 242 did not call on Israel to withdraw from all the
territory as does this UNSC demand.
Resolution 242 acknowledged
Israel’s right to protect itself and live in peace within secure and recognized
borders. Although the UNSC resolution restates these essential prerequisites it
has the chutzpah to impose where these borders should be by renaming anything
beyond the so-called 1967 lines “occupied Palestine territory.” As such, the Security Council converts a false
definition into international law.
It also ignored ongoing
Palestinian belligerency (terror) and their absolute lack of respect for and
acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial claims and political
independence of every State in the area to live in peace, particularly Israel, as
demanded in UN Resolution 242. Formally, the UN Resolution 242 was sent to and
approved by the Security Council. They have now obliterated these commitments.
Packed with demands of Israel to meet specific obligations, it makes no such
demand of the Palestinian Authority and not of Hamas. Actually, Hamas is not
mentioned once. It is as if Hamas didn’t exist.
Instead the UNSC Resolution
blankets Israel as the sole perpetrator of international lawlessness
overlooking ongoing Palestinian belligerency save for asking the PA to confront
those engaging in terror as if those engaging in terror had nothing to do with
the Palestinian Authority and their incitement to and glorification of Palestinian
terrorism against Israel.
There are international laws that
permit states to retain territory acquired in wars inflicted on them by
aggressive enemies for the defensive state’s security and its citizen’s safety.
That was the case of Israel which acquired territory in defensive wars against
invading Arab armies. This gives
international legitimacy to Israel’s claims to territories gained not in one
war of aggression against the Jewish state (1948) but two (1948 and 1967).
All this was ignored by a Security
Council determined to plough its way to legal impositions against Israel in
their haste to establish a Palestinian entity on land on which Israel has
longstanding and legal claims.
The United Nations brushes aside
the fact that the Palestine they crave to establish is and will remain a
dysfunctional, divided, violent, undemocratic society that refuses to recognise
Israel’s right to exist as the Jewish state. Both sides of the Palestinian
political divide have permanent agendas to eradicate the Jewish state at some convenient
future time. As proof, the charters of both the PLO and Hamas call for the
eventual destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews. As further proof just
listen or read the exhortations emanating out of their official statements and
the official Palestinian media.
This was not addressed by the
UNSC. It was not called unlawful. It was ignored, irrelevant to their sole
ambition to create this monster and leave the parties to sort out the
consequences.
The UNSC vote also obliterated
the Oslo Accords signed on the White House lawn between Yasser Arafat and
Yizhak Rabin in the presence of President Bill Clinton and witnessed by the EU and
Russia.
The Oslo Accords divided the
territories known as Judea & Samaria or the West Bank into three zones.
Area A was put under the civil and security administration of the Palestinian
Authority. Area B was given to the PA for their civil rule while the security
elements were agreed to be a joint Israeli-PA project. Area C was designated to be under complete
Israel civil and security control until some future permanent peace agreement
depending on the terms and conditions of such an agreement.
Currently in Area C there are almost
600,000 Jews and just under 100,000 Arabs residing there although the
Palestinian Authority with the physical and financial assistant of European
countries and the EU are creating facts on the ground by transferring Bedouin
Arabs into Area C. These people live in buildings provided by the EU in
defiance of the provisions of Area C.
According to the Oslo Accords, Area
C will be negotiated in the permanent status negotiations which have not taken
place because the Palestinian Authority, and certainly not Palestinian Hamas, has
any inclination to sit with the Israeli leadership to negotiate mutual
recognition, borders, or any other final status provisions.
The wording of new UNSC vote would
have us believe that this Oslo Accord provision is null and void. Area C has
been replaced and given the status of “illegally occupied Palestinian
territory.” Not so. The presumption
that Israel must withdraw from all territories or that Jews will not continue
to live and work on Judea & Samaria is a gross and deliberate aberration.
What was most abhorrent in the
wording of the unanimously approved UNSC resolution was the removal of all Israeli claims to the most holy
Jewish sites placing them at the feet of the Palestinians.
When the United Nations Security
Council calls the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem with its
synagogues, yeshivot, Jewish population and businesses, the Jewish Temple Mount
and the Western Wall and all its antiquities, and the Jewish cemetery on the
Mount of Olives, the Hadassah Hospital and other profoundly Jewish/Israeli
institutions and heritage as “Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967,
including East Jerusalem” it is a surrender that no Israeli government or
any caring Jew are prepared to accept.
I doubt that many Jews in the
global community would permit the United Nations to dispense so glibly with
three thousand years of Jewish history.
The fact that the United States,
New Zealand, the UK and France lent their hand to this infamous act is
appalling.
Barry Shaw is the Senior Associate for Public Diplomacy at the Israel
Institute for Strategic Studies and the author of the upcoming and timely book ‘1917.
From Palestine to the Land of Israel.’