Friday, 29 March 2019

The Corbyn and Omar Threat to Jews and Israel.

Out of the political deterioration in Britain and America, the double-headed hydra of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism has emerged.
The venom in both the British and American parties stem from the radical left, affiliated with an imported ideology, a red-green alliance, exploiting the political turmoil to advance their agenda. It is an agenda that will bring ruin to both countries.
In Britain, the failure of the ruling party to satisfy the demand of the people, namely an affirmative withdrawal from Europe, known as Brexit, gave rise to the radical left Labour Party with ideas that will bring social and economic disaster to Britain.
In America, a country ripped apart by a resentful Democratic Party, reeling after the embarrassing defeat of their revered candidate to an outsider in the 2016 Presidential election, opened the door to a new radical left with ideas and ideologies that will bring social and economic ruin to the United States.
Out of the confusion of both countries, dark voices began to be heard.
In Britain, the volume of blatant Jew hatred at local and national level within the left-wing Labour Party was met with protest by people within the party and by representatives of the British Jewish community to little effect. Even the demand for the Labour Party to adopt the full version of the official IHRC definition of anti-Semitism was answered by the adoption of a doctored version after a very public struggle.
In America, as in Britain, anti-Semitic tropes are heard within the opposition party by newly elected members of Congress. In both cases, the targets were Israel and Jews. In both cases, the rhetoric stereotyped Jewish money and power, and the Jewish State as an evil and illegitimate entity.
In both England and America, Jews have, traditionally, found political homes in the British Labour Party and in the American Democratic Party.
Decades ago, both parties harbored the working class, and Jewish immigrants, fleeing the Holocaust, found political shelter there as they assimilated. As they prospered, they remained loyal to the parties they had adopted.
Both parties supported the desire of the Jewish people for self-determination in their ancient homeland and the reconstituted State of Israel. It was the right and moral thing to do, particularly after the horrors of the Holocaust.
Jews expressed their enthusiasm for both parties by voting for and supporting them. An American Jews saying was, “You’re born a Democrat, and you die a Democrat.” The same applied to Jewish Labour Party members.
Jews became donors and delegates, rising to high positions in both parties. They were patriotic and effective leaders.
When we look at the British Labour Party today it is difficult to believe that only four years ago it had a Jewish leader, Ed Miliband. Now look at it today.
It is rife with anti-Semites at all levels.
Joan Ryan, a non-Jewish Member of Parliament, told the AIPAC Conference in March, “Why did I, a non-Jew, travel to your conference to tell you this? I did so to remind you that things can change quickly. I would never have believed, just three years ago, that the party which backed the Jewish homeland even before the Balfour Declaration would have sunk so low so fast.”
She spoke at AIPAC, but she was addressing the Democratic Party that is experiencing the early signs of anti-Semitism dressed up in Anti-Zionism. She was telling them that things can deteriorate very rapidly when anti-Semitism is allowed to spread in a political party.
She spoke about the downward spiral of Jew and Israel hatred that has infested her party, a party she recently walked away from after forty years as a member.
Why did she leave, rather than fight the anti-Semitism from her position as a leading member and a prominent parliamentarian?  Because she, like so many others, found that confronting the ogre from within was a desperately useless battle. Instead of admitting the problem and solve it there was a resistance against her protest from within her party.
 Joan Ryan admitted that, “despite the best efforts of some decent members, it is riddled with anti-Semitism. It now seeks to demonize and delegitimize Israel.”
We can see the new anti-Semitism, loosely guised as anti-Israelism, infecting the Democratic Party. That party is also failing to adequately fix the problem.
Her party, Ryan told AIPAC, was “now led by a man who proudly declares Hamas and Hezbollah to be his friends. And so, along with eight members of Parliament, we made a choice. We decided that words were simply not enough. We walked away from the Labour Party.”
The Democratic Party now has new representatives in Congress that consider Hamas their friends.
Joan Ryan and her colleagues have been joined by many others, both Jewish and non-Jewish veterans of a party they once loved, who left because of the grip on the party of those who harbor disdain for Jews and Israel.
Americans should be made aware of a dangerous phenomenon in the increasingly hard left British Labour Party. There is a Soviet-style purging of party members that do not toe the party line and show total loyalty to the party and its leader.  In the Soviet Union such people were shamed, or disappeared. In Britain, they are de-selected by branch officials, thereby overruling the will of the voter.    
Brits vote for their individual parliamentary representatives at local level. But, with the anti-Semitism scandal rocking the party, the party has struck back at the protesters, shaming and ejecting them. It is called “de-selection.” In effect, the local branch committee can remove a duly elected member on the grounds of bringing the party into disrepute. Protesting anti-Semitism within the party or criticizing Corbyn can lead to an elected member being thrown out of the party. It has echoes of Soviet-style tactics and, in essence, is anti-democratic.
Luciana Berger, a prominent Jewish Member of Parliament, said that her Labour Party had become “institutionally anti-Semitic.”  She received abusive anti-Semitic insults and death threats to the point that she needed a permanent security team to protect her from members of her own party. She was called “a disruptive Zionist” and worse. She faced two votes of no-confidence from the branch officials at her Liverpool Waverley constituency. In challenging this attempt to purge her, she said that she had made "no secret that, as a Jewish woman representing a city with a Jewish community, I have been deeply disturbed by the lack of response from Jeremy Corbyn as party leader and many in the wider leadership of the party to the anti-Semitism that stains our party."
Unable to quell the hate, or bring her party to adequately address the problem, Berger led a group of seven Labour MPs out of the party and formed an independent group within Parliament.
This flight of traditional Labour members has led to them being replaced by hardened leftists who vow allegiance to their Hamas and Hezbollah supporting leader and to their local party officials, making it a less tolerant party.
How depth of radicalism in the British Labour Party could be seen at their last annual conference.  In voting for their top ten policy priorities, Palestine was their main foreign policy issue, taking preference over Brexit, social services, welfare, the healthcare system, and local government funding. In effect, Labour members, including many trade union members, voted for Palestine ahead of issues that affect them personally and collectively.
Corbyn is on record saying, "The UK has a very close relationship with Israel and it is time that relationship is brought to an end."
Can this happen within the Democratic Party?  This is precisely what Tlaib and Omar are saying in their opening days in Congress. That the United States has a special relationship with Israel and that they intend to bring that relationship to an end. 
The process has begun. Rashida Tlaib did not wrap herself in the Stars and Stripes when she was elected to Congress. Instead, she draped herself in a Palestinian flag.
Newly arrived Ilhan Omar immediately hit out at Israel, its Prime Minister, Jews and their money. She was guest speaker at a fund-raising event for an organization that had supported her campaign and Hamas. 
CAIR is an organization professing to represent the civil and social needs of American Muslims. That would be fine if that was their agenda, but CAIR is the American Muslim Brotherhood with a proven identity of supporting Hamas, a designated Palestinian terror organization. And CAIR is now strutting the halls of Congress with confidence pushing aside anyone attempting to ask pertinent questions of their congressional representatives.
Asra Nomani, a true Muslim reformer who wanted to address Ilhan Omar on her anti-Semitic remarks, was confronted by CAIR bullies who prevented her from speaking to Omar.
In Britain, Jeremy Corbyn receives support from similar organizations to CAIR. He addressed the Islamic Human Rights Council in London. Like CAIR, they pose as caring for the British Muslim community, but they have a stealth agenda to promote dawa and sharia into Britain. Ahead of Corbyn, a radical imam, Sheikh Bramanpour, spoke openly about wiping Israel off the map. Corbyn followed him onto the stage and, instead of condemning the imam’s words, told IHRC that they “represent all that is best in Islam.”
It remains to be seen if CAIR, Omar and Tlaib represent all that is best of Islam in America. Up to now we have seen the hateful, anti-Semitic, anti-Israel side of all three.
I can personally vouch for the veracity of Asra Nomani as a genuine peacemaker and reformer having had the honor of sharing a stage with her at a Conference in Jerusalem a few years back.
If Asra Nomani were in Congress, instead of Ilhan Omar, we would have more confidence in the future of the Democratic Party and America.

Barry Shaw is the International Public Diplomacy Associate at the Israel Institute of Strategic Studies. He is a researcher into contemporary anti-Semitism and the author of ‘Fighting Hamas, BDS, and Anti-Semitism’ which examines the anti-Semitism at all levels of the Palestinian cause.






1 comment: