The biased hypocrisy of the #MeToo Movement was blatantly
obvious when Tara Reade came forward to complain about being sexually assaulted
by Democratic Presidential nominee, Joe Biden.
Result? Total silence.
The assault took place in his Senate office in 1993. Reade put
her complaint on record at the Senate. Her complaint was ignored. She also complained about Biden’s assault to
friends and family.
In March of last year, Reade told the Union, a Nevada
County, California, paper, that Biden had a habit of touching her
inappropriately when she worked for him between 1992 and 1993. “He used to
put his hand on my shoulder and run his finger up my neck,” she said. “I
would just kind of freeze and wait for him to stop doing that.” According
to the Union,
a “confidante” of Reade’s confirmed the account. Reade also added that
she was fired over her refusal to serve drinks at an event, after learning
Biden allegedly wanted her to do so because he liked her legs. She said that
many of the senior employees in Biden’s office “protected” their boss.
Last month, she expanded on the
allegation on the Katie Halper
Show, telling the filmmaker that Biden assaulted her when she was
dropping off a gym bag with him in spring 1993. “I handed him the thing and
he greeted me,” Reade said. “There was no like exchange really. He just
had me up against the wall.”
“It happened all at once,” she continued. “His hands were on me and underneath my
clothes. And then he went down my skirt, but then up inside it and he
penetrated me with his fingers. And he was kissing me at the same time.” Reade
said Biden asked her if she “wanted to go somewhere else,” and when she
broke away from him, that he said: “Come on, man, I heard you liked me.”
Reade repeated her story to the Times,
recalling how the alleged assault “happened at once,” and how she
remembers him telling her afterward: “‘You’re nothing to me. Nothing.’ Then,
he took my shoulders and said, ‘You’re OK, you’re fine.’”
Reade says she subsequently told her mother, now
deceased, and two friends, who confirmed to the Times that
she’d shared her account with them. She also says she made harassment
complaints to Marianne Baker, Mr. Biden’s executive assistant, and two of his
top aides, Dennis Toner and Ted Kaufman, without getting into specifics. When
they didn’t do anything, she says she filed a written complaint with “a
Senate personnel office.”
Reade alleges that she later experienced workplace
retaliation — she says a number of her responsibilities, including intern management,
were taken away — which culminated with Kaufman firing her.
Reade’s brother and two friends do recall her
talking about her “traumatic experience” while working in Biden’s office.
It is interesting to compare how the Democrats, their
compliant media, and the #MeToo activists responded to this complaint and ow
they acted in their fiery outrage against Trump nominee, Judge Brett Kavanagh.
Remember the MeToo cry “Believe All Women!” when a
false complaint was brought about him over some vague event decades before?
What happened to that slogan when it came to Biden’s accuser?
Well, nothing.
The biased shoe, it seems, is on the other foot when a leading
Democrat is the abuser.
Lara Reade must go the way of Juanita Broderick, Paula
Jones, Kathleen Willey, Gennifer Flowers and all the other women raped or sexually
molested by another high profile Democrat, President Bill Clinton.
In the Kavanagh case, the media had a field day attacking
him and his family mercilessly.
Biden, on the other hand, is protected by a media that will
be rock solid behind his 2020 candidacy.
When unsubstantiated rumors were brought against a
college-period Kavanagh, Jason Johnson, the political editor of The Root said
on MSNBC, in September 2019, “I never heard of a one-time rapist.”
This TV jerk called Judge Kavanagh a “gang rapist,”
based on no evidence whatsoever.
There was no corroboration that Kavanagh ever met his
accuser at the time and place she mentioned. There is clear evidence of the
working relationship between Reade and Biden.
Is Johnson now prepared to go back onto MSNBC and say the
same about Joe Biden? I doubt it.
Biden deserves due process, but Lara Reade’s complaint also deserves
the same respect and due diligence that was afforded to Christine Blassey Ford.
If that was an essential step in the process of affirming
Kavanagh onto the Supreme Court, how much more essential is it to thoroughly
investigate charges against a Presidential nominee, Joe Biden, in advance of
the November election?
The New York Times led the charge against Brett Kavanagh in
large part because of their political bias. Kavanagh was the nominee of
President Trump, therefore in their eyes worthy of persecution and prosecution.
This bias clearly warped their coverage against Lara Reade’s
complaint against their 2020 champion, Joe Biden.
Their double standard and their botched up job at all levels
was truly jaw dropping.
The story of Joe Biden’s impropriety had been brewing for over
a week and the NYT had to print something. Lara Reade’s complaint was graphically
explicit and required a response.
Part of the NYT’s coverage of the incident on April 12 included
a startling sentence.
"The Times found no pattern of
sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that
women previously said made them uncomfortable."
Perhaps inadvertently, the Times
has opened up a history of Biden’s penchant of sliding up to women and fondling
them.
This leads to the necessity of examining
in detail Biden’s strange sexual behavior over the years.
Does America was another Democratic
President touching and fondling women making them feel uncomfortable to be in
close proximity to him?
Where is #MeToo when you need them
most? Missing in action.
This section of the NYT article was
removed following a call from Biden’s campaign team, showing clear evidence of
media compliance by a news outlet in an election period.
Then the big shoe fell.
NYT Executive Director, Dean
Basquet, opened his mouth and put his foot in it.
“I think that the campaign thought
that the phrasing was awkward and made it look like there were other
instances in which he had been accused of sexual misconduct."
Then he seemed to emphasize Biden’s
strange pathology with women.
"We didn’t think it was a
factual mistake. I thought it was an awkward phrasing issue that could be
read different ways and that it wasn’t something factual we were correcting.”
The big boss of NYT didn’t think it
was a factual mistake that Biden fondles women, or worse.
This should have been one of the
biggest political stories in an election year. It certainly would have been
based on the lies that were printed about a Trump non-event with hookers in a
Moscow hotel prior to the election four years ago.
But to Basquet, this was “just a
different news judgment moment.”
Yes, it was. Basquet’s judgment was
to dilute the story at the request of the Biden squad, a courtesy he did not
afford Donald Trump in 2016.
The Biden election team find it
awkward to deal with their client’s sexual proclivities.
The double standard is open and
amazing. It goes deeper than sexual misconduct.
Biden seems to have gotten away
with a history of nepotism with his family’s get rich quick schemes by
following or escorting their father/brother/father-in-law around the world and then
personally signing multi-million dollar deals in his wake.
Now the media and his party are
covering up a history of sexual abuse.
Surely Americans wants these issues
investigated before they place their vote?
Barry Shaw,
Israel Institute for Strategic Studies.
No comments:
Post a Comment